NVDA — NVIDIA Corp.
- Net margin
- 56%
- ROIC
- 71%
- Owner Earnings
- $96.7B
Read as a Asset-light compounder business — little inventory and a 71% gross margin — the value is in IP and people, not factories.
The record — 2017–2026
realized figures from each filing — no estimates| 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | TTMApr 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.9B | $9.7B | $11.7B | $10.9B | $16.7B | $26.9B | $27.0B | $60.9B | $130.5B | $215.9B | $253.5B |
| Gross margin | 59% | 60% | 61% | 62% | 62% | 65% | 57% | 73% | 75% | 71% | 74% |
| Operating margin | 28.0% | 33.0% | 32.5% | 26.1% | 27.2% | 37.3% | 15.7% | 54.1% | 62.4% | 60.4% | 64.0% |
| Net income | $1.7B | $3.0B | $4.1B | $2.8B | $4.3B | $9.8B | $4.4B | $29.8B | $72.9B | $120.1B | $159.6B |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $0.12 | $0.17 | $0.11 | $0.17 | $0.39 | $0.17 | $1.19 | $2.94 | $4.90 | $6.54 |
| Owner earnings | — | — | — | — | — | $8.1B | $3.8B | $27.0B | $60.9B | $96.7B | $119.1B |
| Owner earnings margin | — | — | — | — | — | 30.2% | 14.1% | 44.4% | 46.6% | 44.8% | 47.0% |
| ROIC | 28% | 56% | 36% | 81% | 19% | 28% | 14% | 64% | 89% | 71% | 72% |
| Book value / share | $0.23 | $0.30 | $0.38 | $0.50 | $0.68 | $1.06 | $0.88 | $1.72 | $3.20 | $6.42 | $8.01 |
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? 503.4×ComfortableOperating income $130.4B ÷ interest expense $259M
Operating profit covers interest with the kind of margin Graham wanted for a defensive holding. Necessary, not sufficient — it says solvent, not cheap.
- How heavy is the debt? 0.1×ConservativeTotal debt $8.5B ÷ operating income $130.4B
Years of operating profit it would take to repay all debt. A first read, not a credit rating: it's gross debt (not netted against cash) over EBIT (not EBITDA), and a cyclical year distorts it.
- How long is cash tied up? 133dCapital-hungryDSO 65 + DIO 125 − DPO 57 days
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. Lower is better; a long cycle means growth itself eats cash.
Is it a good business?
- Return on invested capital 71%ExceptionalNOPAT $110.7B ÷ invested capital $155.2B (debt + equity − cash)
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it — Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; below ~8% the company may destroy value as it grows. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high — pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Owner Earnings (free cash) margin 45%Cash machineOwner Earnings $96.7B = operating cash $102.7B − capex $6.0B
What an owner could take out without starving the business. That's 45% of revenue. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $6.4B of SBC) leaves $90.3B. Honest caveat: capex here blends maintenance and growth, so steady-state Owner Earnings may run higher (see capex vs. depreciation).
- Are earnings backed by cash? 0.86×Mostly cash-backedCash from ops $102.7B ÷ net income $120.1B
How much of reported profit showed up as operating cash. Above 1× is reassuring; well below suggests earnings lean on accruals. One year is noisy — growth and working-capital swings distort it, and this is operating cash, not free cash. Watch the multi-year trend.
How is the cash used?
- Where do the earnings go? 42%Returns about halfDividends + buybacks $41.1B ÷ Owner Earnings $96.7B
Of $96.7B Owner Earnings, $41.1B (42%) went back to shareholders — $974M dividends, $40.1B buybacks. Net of $6.4B stock comp, the real buyback was about $33.7B. Returning most of it signals a mature cash machine; reinvesting most could mean a long runway — or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 2.13×ExpandingCapex $6.0B ÷ depreciation $2.8B
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth — or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency — or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Durability & moat — 2017–2026
A moat is a high return that doesn’t fade, reinvested at high returns. Here is what the record says — judgments, not another chart of the numbers.
- Profitable years 10 of 10
Never lost money over the record — the earnings stability Graham insisted on.
- Return on capital ≥ 15% 9 of 10 yrs
A moat shows up as a high return on invested capital that holds year after year — not one good vintage.
- Operating margin 31% → 61%
Margins are widening — pricing power intact or improving.
- Reinvestment — incremental ROIC 78%
Every extra dollar the company reinvested earned a high return — it is still compounding, not coasting on an old moat.
- Owner earnings growth +33%/yr
Free cash to owners grew about 33% a year over the record.
- Worst year 2023 · 15.7% op. margin
Stayed profitable even in its hardest year — the resilience that survives recessions.
- Dividend record rising
Paid and raised the dividend across the record — the continuity Graham prized.
Solvent is not the same as cheap; growing is not the same as good. These are vital signs, not a verdict — the judgment is yours, and the filing is one click away.
Peers — Asset-light compounder
The same business model, side by side on owner economics — compare, don't rank by a single number. ● marks best in the group.