LUMN — Lumen Technologies
Owner’s Scorecard
Will it survive?
- Can it pay its interest? -0.6×Does not cover its interestOperating income ($812M) ÷ interest expense $1.3B
A full year of operating profit didn't cover the interest bill. This is the zombie zone: the business depends on refinancing, asset sales, or forbearance to service its debt.
- How heavy is the debt? —Debt against an operating lossTotal debt $7.3B · operating income ($812M)
There's debt but no operating profit to measure it against — understand that combination before anything else about the company.
- How long is cash tied up? -39dNegative — funded by othersDSO 42 + DIO 2 − DPO 83 days
Days cash is tied up between paying suppliers and collecting from customers. A negative cycle is a quiet moat: suppliers and customers fund the operation (Buffett's “float”) — the company grows on other people's money.
Is it a good business?
- Return on invested capital -12%Below averageNOPAT ($641M) ÷ invested capital $5.2B (debt + equity − cash)
The rate the business earns on the money tied up in it — Buffett's north star, because over time a stock tracks the ROIC beneath it. Above ~15% sustained hints at a moat; below ~8% the company may destroy value as it grows. Asset-light businesses (R&D expensed, little capital) read artificially high — pair this with Owner Earnings.
- Owner Earnings (free cash) margin 15%SolidOwner Earnings $1.7B = operating cash $4.7B − capex $3.0B
What an owner could take out without starving the business. That's 15% of revenue. Treating stock comp as the real expense it is (less $48M of SBC) leaves $1.6B. Honest caveat: capex here blends maintenance and growth, so steady-state Owner Earnings may run higher (see capex vs. depreciation).
- Are earnings backed by cash? $4.7BLoss, but cash-generativeNet income ($1.7B) · cash from operations $4.7B
The company reported a net loss, so a conversion ratio isn't meaningful. What matters then is whether operations still threw off cash — here, they did.
How is the cash used?
- Where do the earnings go? 0%Reinvests most of itDividends + buybacks $1M ÷ Owner Earnings $1.7B
Of $1.7B Owner Earnings, $1M (0%) went back to shareholders — $1M dividends, $0 buybacks. Returning most of it signals a mature cash machine; reinvesting most could mean a long runway — or empire-building. The split doesn't say which; the return earned on it (see ROIC) does.
- Investing or harvesting? 1.11×MaintainingCapex $3.0B ÷ depreciation $2.7B
Descriptive, not a grade. Above ~1× means investing faster than assets wear out (growth — or, sustained for years, today's earnings carrying less depreciation than tomorrow's will). Below means spending less than it's wearing out (efficiency — or a melting asset base). The ratio won't tell you which; the filings will.
Durability — 2019–2025
A moat is high return that doesn’t fade. Here are the quality metrics across a full cycle — judge the consistency, not the latest dot.
- Return on invested capitalhistory pending —
- Operating margin-7%
- Owner Earnings marginhistory pending —
Solvent is not the same as cheap; growing is not the same as good. These are vital signs, not a verdict — the judgment is yours, and the filing is one click away.